AVAILABLE from WIPF AND STOCK: The Knowledge of God and the Service of God According to the Teaching of the Reformation - Recalling the Scottish Confession of 1560 (Gifford Lectures 1937 & 1938); BY Karl Barth; TRANSLATED BY J. L. M. Haire, Ian Henderson #barth#karlbarth#reformation#wipfandstock "These lectures on that teaching [of the Reformed church on natural theology] will not take the form of an independent outline, but will be connected with a 'document' of the Reformation. Further, taking into account the specifically Scottish character of the Gifford foundation, this document will be a document of the 'Scottish' Reformation. . . . I am letting John Knox and his friend speak in their 'Confessio Scotica' of 1560. This is not to take the form of an historical analysis of the Scottish Confession, but that of a theological paraphrase and elucidation of the document as it speaks to-day and as we to-day by a careful objective examination of its content can hear it speak."
NEW from PICKWICK PUBLICATIONS: The Humanity of Christ - The Significance of the Anhypostasis and Enhypostasis in Karl Barth's Christology; BY James P. Haley #barth#karlbarth#theology#christ#anhypostasis#enhypostasis#pickwick#pickwickpublications#wipfandstock
This work is a critical analysis of Karl Barth’s unique adoption of the concepts anhypostasis and enhypostasis to explain Christ’s human nature in union with the Logos, which becomes the ontological foundation that Barth uses to explain Jesus Christ as very God and very man. The significance of these concepts in Barth’s Christology first emerges in the Göttingen Dogmatics and is then more fully developed throughout the Church Dogmatics. Barth’s unique coupling together of anhypostasis and enhypostasis provides the ontological grounding, flexibility, and precision that so uniquely characterizes his Christology. As such, Barth expresses the Word became flesh as the revelation of God that flows out of the coalescence of Christ’s human nature with his divine nature as the mediation of reconciliation. This ontological dynamic provides the impetus for Barth’s critique of Chalcedon’s static definition of the union of divine and human natures in Christ from which Barth transitions to an active definition of these two natures. Not only does anhypostasis and enhypostasis explain the dynamic union between the divine and human natures in Christ, but also the dynamic union between Jesus Christ and his Church, which reaches its apex in the reconciliation of humanity with God, in Christ. The ontological foundation of anhypostasis and enhypostasis in Christ’s union with his Church explains the importance of the royal man in understanding genuine human nature, the exaltation of human nature, and the sanctification of human nature.
James P. Haley is Research Associate in Systematic Theology and Ecclesiology at Stellenbosch University. He also serves as Associate Pastor at Pleasant Grove Presbyterian Church and is an Adjunct Professor at Birmingham Theological Seminary.